Jaguar XJ 1997 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 316 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Volvo S90. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.7 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |