Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 262 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 13.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 60 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |