Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 13 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Despite less power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XJ consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |