Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Honda Saber 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda Saber, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Saber. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 23 cm longer than the Honda Saber, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Saber has
| |