Jaguar XJ 2005 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 321 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 74 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.8 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S80) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |