Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Lexus LS 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 386 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 493 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 111 HP less power than Lexus LS, but torque is 107 NM more than Lexus LS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 10.7 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 16 cm longer than the Lexus LS, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 510 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 10 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.9 metres more than that of the Lexus LS, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Lexus LS has
| |