Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 143 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 196 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.4 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XJ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Impala engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
| |