Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Toyota Camry 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 231 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 119 HP more power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 469 NM more than Toyota Camry. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | Used also on Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XJ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 37 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 493 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |