Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Audi A6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Audi A6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.8 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | Used also on Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XJ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 32 cm longer than the Audi A6, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 38 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Audi A6 has
| |