Jaguar XJ 1982 vs BMW 5 series 1981
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.4 - 5.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 290 HP | 86 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 - 436 NM | 140 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 11 seconds | 7.2 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 14.1 | 7.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 34 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`798 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |