Jaguar XJ 1982 vs SAAB 90 1984
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas SAAB 90 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 3.4 - 5.3 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 290 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 - 436 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 11 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 14.1 | 10.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 38 cm longer than the SAAB 90, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the SAAB 90, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
SAAB 90 has
| |