Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Volvo 960 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 226 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 377 NM | 225 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.8 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.9 | 8.1 - 11.2 | |
|
On average, the Jaguar XJ petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 2`027 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |