Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Opel Omega 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 226 HP | 73 - 377 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 377 NM | 138 - 568 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.8 seconds | 5.4 - 19 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.9 | 6.9 - 11.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 25 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 870 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`942 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Opel Omega has
| |