Jaguar XJ 1986 vs BMW 5 series 1988

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Jaguar XJ 1986 - 1994	BMW 5 series 1988 - 1995
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Jaguar XJ is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	2.9 - 4.0 (petrol)	1.8 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel)
Performance
Power:	150 - 226 HP	113 - 286 HP
Torque:	225 - 377 NM	162 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.3 - 10.8 seconds	6.3 - 14 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	10.3 - 11.9	7.0 - 12.0
	Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.99 m	4.72 m
Width:	1.79 m	1.75 m
Height:	1.38 m	1.41 m
	Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	no data	460 litres
Turning diameter:	12.4 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`500	~ 1`999

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	above average
Average price (€):	5200	3600
Pros and Cons:	Jaguar XJ has only petrol engines available	BMW 5 sērija has available with 4x4 drive petrol and diesel engines available lower fuel consumption for petrol engines better manoeuvrability lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Jaguar XJ 1986 vs BMW 5 series 1988

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions