Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Volvo 940 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 226 HP | 82 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 377 NM | 145 - 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.8 seconds | 9 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.9 | 7.5 - 10.3 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 940. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`878 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |