Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Chrysler Concorde 1993

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XJ
1994 - 1997
Chrysler Concorde
1993 - 1997
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Jaguar XJ is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler Concorde is available only with automatic gearbox.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Concorde can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 3.2 - 4.03.3 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 219 - 326 HP163 - 218 HP
Torque: 315 - 512 NM245 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 9.4 secondsn/a seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.6 - 12.010.3 - 11.3
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Concorde.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.15 m
Width: 1.80 m1.89 m
Height: 1.31 m1.43 m
Jaguar XJ is smaller.
Jaguar XJ is 13 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data473 litres
Turning diameter: 12.1 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`500no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 5200no data
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJ has
  • both manual and automatic
Chrysler Concorde has
  • automatic transmission only
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv