Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 9.4 - 16.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.82 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 40 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 551 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJ has 31 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |