Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XJ also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.1 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 31 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 463 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |