Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 184 - 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 233 - 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.1 | 8.1 - 10.7 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 8 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |