Jaguar XF 2015 vs Audi A6 2018

 
Jaguar XF
2015 -
Audi A6
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 180 HP286 HP
Torque: 430 NM620 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 secondsn/a seconds
Jaguar XF engine produces 106 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Audi A6.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.35.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery SportUsed also on Audi A7
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.94 m
Width: 1.99 m1.89 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Jaguar XF is larger.
Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres530 litres
Jaguar XF has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`250no data
Safety:
The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 21 40038 600
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XF has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv