Jaguar XF 2011 vs Citroen C5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 14 HP less power than Citroen C5. Despite less power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 18 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 101 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`231 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |