Jaguar XF 2011 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 54 HP more power than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 546 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 6 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |