Jaguar XF 2017 vs Audi A6 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7 seconds | |
Jaguar XF engine produces 5 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 5 NM less than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
570 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 565 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`310 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 15 200 | 31 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |