Jaguar XF 2012 vs Peugeot 508 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 41 HP less power than Peugeot 508, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Peugeot 508. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 508, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 508) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Used also on Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 15 cm longer than the Peugeot 508, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1592 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 38 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 508. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 508, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Peugeot 508 has
| |