Jaguar XF 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available only with rear wheel drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 510 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 293 - 625 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 12.5 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 50 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.28 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`291 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |