Jaguar S-Type 2004 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar S-Type is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.2 | 2.7 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 400 HP | 204 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 541 NM | 300 - 553 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 9.9 seconds | 5.3 - 8.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 12.4 | 8.1 - 12.3 | |
|
Jaguar S-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. On average, Jaguar S-Type equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is smaller. Jaguar S-Type is 21 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage space. Jaguar S-Type has 70 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |