Jaguar F-Type 2019 vs Renault Laguna 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Type engine produces 130 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Type consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Laguna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.40 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 17 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 336 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
509 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 87 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |