Jaguar F-Type 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 550 HP | 315 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 680 NM | 370 - 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 5.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 11.3 | 10.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is smaller. Jaguar F-Type is 35 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 113 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`075 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |