Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs Audi TT 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi TT can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 575 HP | 180 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 250 - 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | 6.1 - 7.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.3 | 5.9 - 6.5 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Type is 29 cm longer than the Audi TT, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 280 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Type has 84 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.96 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.34 metres more than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 1`646 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Audi TT has
| |