Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 36 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Pace has 67 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Pace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`460 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |