Isuzu Rodeo 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991

 
Isuzu Rodeo
1995 - 1998
Mitsubishi Pajero
1991 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP147 HP
Torque: 204 NM211 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Isuzu Rodeo engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.0no data
Fuel tank capacity: 83 litres75 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years39 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.66 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.66 m1.86 m
Isuzu Rodeo is smaller.
Isuzu Rodeo is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 20 cm lower.
Seats: 6 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data1080 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data1080 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2050 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0662`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data3600
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Pajero has
    • more power
    • has 4x4 drive
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv