Isuzu Rodeo 1995 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Isuzu Rodeo 1995 engine produces 10 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo 1998, but torque is 9 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo 1998. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Isuzu Rodeo 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Isuzu Rodeo 1995 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Isuzu Rodeo 1995 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Isuzu Rodeo 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo 1995 is smaller. Isuzu Rodeo 1995 is 3 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo 1998, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo 1995 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2297 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`066 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |