Isuzu Rodeo 1998 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.2 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 208 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 290 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.5 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo is smaller, but higher. Isuzu Rodeo is 12 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu Rodeo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 933 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2297 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Isuzu Rodeo has 970 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`191 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Isuzu Rodeo has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |