Isuzu D-Max 2008 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Isuzu D-Max 2008 engine produces 27 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max 2012, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Isuzu D-Max 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max 2008 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Isuzu D-Max 2008 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Isuzu D-Max 2008 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Isuzu D-Max 2008 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.03 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Isuzu D-Max 2008 is smaller. Isuzu D-Max 2008 is 27 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max 2012, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Isuzu D-Max 2008 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |