Infiniti Q50 2013 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infiniti Q50 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.7 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 405 HP | 180 - 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 475 NM | 340 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 8.5 seconds | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 9.3 | 4.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Infiniti Q50 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. On average, Infiniti Q50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is smaller. Infiniti Q50 is 16 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 17 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Infiniti Q50 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti Q50 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Infiniti Q50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`302 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |