Hyundai ix35 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Hyundai ix35
2009 - 2013
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.41.6 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 115 - 184 HP114 - 150 HP
Torque: 164 - 383 NM154 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 12.4 seconds10.2 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 9.24.6 - 8.1
Hyundai ix35 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Hyundai ix35 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 170 mm (6.7 inches)170 - 195 mm (6.7 - 7.7 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.30 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.67 m1.62 m
Hyundai ix35 is larger.
Hyundai ix35 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 591 litres442 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1436 litres1219 litres
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity.
Hyundai ix35 has 149 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`044~ 2`005
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 780011 400
Pros and Cons: Hyundai ix35 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv