Hyundai i30 2007 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 6 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 and Kia Ceed are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Hyundai i30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`728 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |