Hyundai Terracan 2001 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Terracan engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Terrano. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Terracan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that by driving the Hyundai Terracan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Terracan consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Carnival | Used also on Nissan Patrol | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Hyundai Terracan is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 10 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Terracan is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Hyundai Terracan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`620 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |