Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 986 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 383 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |