Hyundai Matrix 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 123 HP | 86 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 235 NM | 117 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 17.9 seconds | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.1 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Hyundai Matrix petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. On average, Hyundai Matrix equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.52 m | |
| Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`813 | ~ 1`276 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |