Hyundai Matrix 2008 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 103 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 235 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 14.3 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.0 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Hyundai Matrix petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Hyundai Matrix equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Matrix is 31 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Hyundai Matrix has 196 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 336 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`820 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |