Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2020
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.21 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
Hyundai Kona is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 422 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1305 litres | |
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Hyundai Kona has 61 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 162 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`725 | |
Safety: | |||
Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 18 000 | 18 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |