Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Citroen C4 Cactus. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Kona consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Kona consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Cactus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
| Hyundai Kona and Citroen C4 Cactus are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Hyundai Kona has 3 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Cactus (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |