Hyundai H1 1998 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Carnival is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai H1 engine produces 38 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Kia Carnival. Due to the lower power, Hyundai H1 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 10.9 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai H1 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai H1 could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Carnival) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai H1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Hyundai H1 is smaller, but higher. Hyundai H1 is 23 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai H1 is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3295 litres | 3320 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai H1 has 62 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The Kia Carnival may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai H1 is 3.1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Hyundai H1 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai H1 has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |