Hyundai H1 2007 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai H1 engine produces 11 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, but torque is 133 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite the higher power, Hyundai H1 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai H1 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai H1 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai H1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Hyundai H1 is smaller, but higher. Hyundai H1 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai H1 is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 851 litres | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3296 litres | |
|
Hyundai H1 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai H1 has 213 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The Chrysler Grand Voyager may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`930 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai H1 has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |