Hyundai Equus 1999 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.5 | 3.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 - 270 HP | 177 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 381 NM | 278 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 13.5 | 9.2 - 10.2 | |
|
Hyundai Equus petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Equus is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Equus is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 525 litres | |
| Hyundai Equus has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`128 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |