Hyundai Elantra 2003 vs Kia Shuma 2001

 
Hyundai Elantra
2003 - 2006
Kia Shuma
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 132 HP114 HP
Torque: 166 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds10.6 seconds
Hyundai Elantra is more dynamic to drive.
Hyundai Elantra engine produces 18 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Kia Shuma. Thanks to more power Hyundai Elantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.0
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Hyundai Elantra consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that by driving the Hyundai Elantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway690 km on highway
Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai MatrixInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Carens, Kia Sephia, Kia Clarus
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Shuma might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Kia Shuma engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.53 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Elantra and Kia Shuma are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 415 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1401 litres1207 litres
Hyundai Elantra has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 194 litres).
Turning diameter: no data9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8451`645
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Hyundai Elantra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Kia Shuma has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv