Hyundai Elantra 2003 vs Kia Shuma 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 143 HP | 101 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 235 NM | 148 - 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.4 | 8.0 - 9.8 | |
|
Hyundai Elantra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Elantra and Kia Shuma are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1401 litres | 1207 litres | |
| Hyundai Elantra has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`816 | ~ 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |