Hyundai Atos 1997 vs Toyota Yaris 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 82 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Atos engine produces 13 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Atos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Atos consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Atos could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Atos consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Atos is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1064 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Hyundai Atos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`220 | 650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Atos has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |