Hyundai Atos 1997 vs Hyundai Atos 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 59 HP | |
| Torque: | 82 NM | 83 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
| Hyundai Atos 1997 engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Atos 2003, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Hyundai Atos 2003. Despite less power, Hyundai Atos 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Atos 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Atos 1997 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Atos 1997 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Atos 1997 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Atos 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Atos 1997 is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Atos 2003, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos 1997 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1064 litres | 1084 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`220 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |